The End of the Gatekeeping Era: Why We’re Putting It All on the Table
For decades, the world of UFO research and Cold War science has been dominated by a small circle of gatekeepers—an old-boys club that claims to champion “disclosure” while keeping their cards close to the vest. They criticize government secrecy, yet mirror it themselves: drip-feeding information, promising endless revelations, and spinning speculation in place of evidence, all while publishing books that reveal little and invite more questions than answers.
We’re not here out of spite, but out of disappointment. When the papers that now make up Engineering Infinity landed in our laps, we felt a responsibility—not just to the public, but to those whose lives and careers have been dismissed or ridiculed for daring to ask tough questions. And to the legacy of Natalja’s father, Valerijs Černohajev, a brilliant Soviet engineer whose work was buried beneath the weight of a system that broke more spirits than it ever fostered genius.
For four years, we reached out to the so-called insiders. We would have been happy to pass the papers along and return to our lives. But the silence was deafening. Here was a body of work with provenance—documents from a source with no vested interest in the UFO topic, whose professional background stands up to scrutiny. I myself have provided on-record whistleblower testimony to the UK Supreme Court on human rights issues.
All we wanted was insight: What are these papers? How do they fit with the Soviet documents George Knapp claims to possess? What do they mean for the history of science and technology? But we got nothing in return.
The irony? The papers we’re sharing actually support many of their claims— with real science and hard evidence. Our research uncovered 47+ agencies and institutions with programs that align 85–95% with the science in these documents. That’s a level of certainty most people never see. For perspective:
President Obama approved the operation against Osama bin Laden with just 60% certainty.
President Bush and Allied Nations invaded Iraq on 30% certainty.
We’ve gone to war on less.
So, we turned to scientists and physicists. They told us the math works, the schematics are credible. Each step brought more validation that this is a significant body of work—unlike anything seen before in public, because those who claim to have their own treasure troves never share them.
That’s why we’ve made it all public. Not as a final word, but as an invitation: to explore, to compare, to lead with thought and analysis. If this is what the USSR was working on, what programs and technologies might have grown from it? What does, or did, the US government have in response? The House UAP Caucus is asking questions, but are they the right ones, in the right way?
There’s a roadmap now—science. We all remember the call to “follow the science.” Now, here’s the chance to do just that. So why the hesitation? Why the silence from those who claim to want disclosure but never deliver it?
We’re done waiting for permission. The era of gatekeeping is over. The archive is open. The cards are on the table.
Let’s see who’s ready to play with real evidence.
If you’re ready to move beyond speculation and secrecy, join us. The conversation—and the investigation—are open to all.
Originally Posted on the Infinity Disclosed Substack June 28, 2025
